Younger wife is key to happy marriage?

Romanticism will never die, but that’s not stopping British researchers from trying to come up with a recipe for the perfect marriage. Said recipe is said to be as efficient as it’s completely devoid of all the things that poets love to write about: in short, it implies the wife has to be at least five years younger than the husband and smarter than him. At the same time, history of divorce downsizes chances of success, the BBC writes.

“They found that if the wife was five or more years older than her husband, they were more than three times more likely to divorce than if they were the same age. If the age gap is reversed, and the man is older than the woman, the odds of marital bliss are higher. Those who have never divorced fare better too. But couples in which one member has been through a divorce in the past are less stable than those in which both members are divorcees.” BBC writes of the findings of the latest study.

Based on that last detail, it would seem that Michael Douglas’ marriage to Catherine Zeta Jones has less chances of success than that of Beyonce and Jay-Z. While it respects the age and education gap criteria, Douglas is a one-time divorcee. However, researchers insist people look for partners “on the basis of love, physical attraction, similarity of taste, beliefs and attitudes, and shared values.” Still, some factors, such as those mentioned above, can help reduce the rate of divorce.

Overtime linked to heart risk

According to the new research, those people who regularly put in overtime and work 10 or 11-hour days increase their heart disease risk by nearly two-thirds. The findings come from a study of 6,000 British civil servants, published online in the European Heart Journal. After accounting for known heart risk factors such as smoking, doctors found those who worked three to four hours of overtime a day ran a 60% higher risk. Experts said the findings highlighted the importance of work-life balance.

Overall, there were 369 cases where people suffered heart disease that caused death, had a heart attack or developed angina. And the number of hours spent working overtime appeared to be strongly linked in many cases. The researchers said there could be a number of explanations for this.

People who spend more time at work have less time to exercise, relax and unwind. They may also be more stressed, anxious, or have depression. A career-minded person will also tend to be a “Type A” personality who is highly driven, aggressive or irritable, they say.

Lead researcher Mianna Virtanen, an epidemiologist at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health in Helsinki and University College London, said: “More research is needed before we can be confident that overtime work would cause coronary heart disease. Although the researchers showed a link between working more than three hours overtime every day and heart problems, the reasons for the increased risk weren’t clear. Until researchers understand how our working lives can affect the risk to our heart health, there are simple ways to look after your heart health at work, like taking a brisk walk at lunch, taking the stairs instead of the lift, or by swapping that biscuit for a piece of fruit.”

What Matters Most is What You Eat After Exercise

Recent study suggested that the benefits of exercise can be greatly affected by the food we eat after it. Differences in what you eat after exercise produce different effects on the body’s metabolism. The study follows up on several previous studies that demonstrate that many benefits of exercise are transient: one exercise session produces benefits to the body that taper off, generally within hours or a few days.

Senior study author, Jeffrey F. Horowitz of the University of Michigan (U-M) said that “many of the improvements in metabolic health associated with exercise stem largely from the most recent session of exercise, rather than from an increase in ‘fitness’ per se. But exercise doesn’t occur in a vacuum, and it is very important to look at both the effects of exercise and what you’re eating after exercise,” he added.

Specifically, the study found that exercise enhanced insulin sensitivity, particularly when meals eaten after the exercise session contained relatively low carbohydrate content. Enhanced insulin sensitivity means that it is easier for the body to take up sugar from the blood stream into tissues like muscles, where it can be stored or used as fuel. Impaired insulin sensitivity (i.e., “insulin resistance”) is a hallmark of Type II diabetes, as well as being a major risk factor for other chronic diseases, such as heart disease.

slightly chubby people live longer?

According to a new study, Japanese may build some self-esteem for overweight people concerned for their health. Despite all the health expert warnings of the risk of obesity, a new Japanese study warns that being very skinny is even more dangerous, and that slightly chubby people live longer.

The study was conducted by a health ministry team led by Tohoku University professor Ichiro Tsuji and covered 50,000 people between the ages of 40 and 79 over 12 years in the northern Japanese prefecture of Miyagi.

The study found that people who are a little overweight at age 40 live six to seven years longer than very thin people, whose average life expectancy was shorter by some five years than that of obese people.

The main reasons for the shorter lifespan of skinny people were believed to include their heightened vulnerability to diseases such as pneumonia and the fragility of their blood vessels.

Easter eggs is Healthy?

According to the latest research, they suggested that Easter eggs and other chocolate can be good for you, as long as you eat only small amounts.

The study of over 19,000 people, published in the European Heart Journal, found those who ate half a bar a week had lower blood pressure. They also had a 39% lower risk of heart attacks and strokes. But, heart campaigners warned that too much chocolate is damaging because it has a lot of calories and saturated fat.

The study also looked at the chocolate consumption of middle-aged men and women over eight years. It compared the health of those who ate the most and least chocolate. The difference between these two groups was just 6 grams a day, equivalent to one small square of chocolate a day.

Dr Brian Buijsse, lead author of Institute of Human Nutrition said: “Our hypothesis was that because chocolate appears to have a pronounced effect on blood pressure, therefore chocolate consumption would lower the risk of strokes and heart attacks, with a stronger effect being seen for stroke.”

This is, in fact, what the study found. Those who ate more chocolate cut their risk of heart attacks by around a quarter, and of stroke by nearly half, compared with those who ate the least. But Dr Buijsse warned that it was important people ensured that eating chocolate did not increase their overall intake of calories or reduce their consumption of healthy foods. Small amounts of chocolate may help to prevent heart disease, but only if it replaces other energy-dense food, such as snacks, in order to keep body weight stable.

promising therapy for epilepsy

According to the US researchers from Stanford University, deep brain stimulation is a promising therapy for epilepsy. In a clinical trial, 110 people had electrodes implanted in their brains and their seizures were monitored. Forty-one per cent of patients showed a reduction in seizures after 13 months while 56% experienced a reduction after two years. The patients all suffered from regular epileptic seizures and had failed to respond to drug treatment.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a surgical treatment involving the implantation of a medical device called a brain pacemaker, which sends electrical impulses to specific parts of the brain. In the group of patients who received brain stimulation, researchers noted a 41% reduction in seizures compared to a 14.5% decline in seizures in a control group. This group did not receive stimulation.

Basically, epilepsy is a common neurological disorder which is characterized by recurrent seizures. These seizures can cause temporary loss of consciousness, convulsions, confusion or disturbances in sensations. About 50 million people worldwide are affected with epilepsy according to the World Health Organization. Previous studies indicate that one third of those with epilepsy do not respond to anti-epileptic drugs.

Dr Robert Fisher, director of the Epilepsy Centre at Stanford University and lead author of the study, said electrical deep brain stimulation does reduce seizure frequency in patients. But he cautioned: “DBS therapy is invasive and serious complications can occur. Additional clinical knowledge would help to determine the best candidates for DBS therapy.”

Simon Wigglesworth, deputy chief executive at UK charity Epilepsy Action, said: “We have been hopeful for some time that deep brain stimulation may be a treatment option for some people with epilepsy. This study is exciting news and could be an important development in the treatment of epilepsy in the 30% of people whose seizures don’t respond to traditional drug therapies.”